Forum
Northern New England Norton Owners
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Gearboxes Galore

Gearboxes Galore 15 Mar 2017 15:51 #1

  • dynodave
  • dynodave's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • dynodave
  • Posts: 450
  • Thank you received: 263
Actually, I was trying to get a few gearboxes ready for this seasons NHT bikes. But I found myself curious about a whole array of technical issues. Further research alerted me to some areas upon which I put vernier calipers and eyeball to.

Many subjects to investigate, since I discovered I have about 23 gearboxes. Topics revolve around the commando gearbox top mounting boss being cut down despite earlier NHT gearboxes matching the engine mount bosses. I could not find a correct thickness top boss shim washer in all the parts I had and also were not available to buy from norton parts sources.
Examination of gearbox cases, intermediate covers and outer covers show a whole array of changes during production that I was totally unaware of. Also, I more accurately familiarized myself with the internal machinery differences.
6203 layshaft bearings ...oh boy.. I have a story for you.
Oh well see you saturday. After the class I'll post some stuff here too! :whistle:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Gearboxes Galore 16 Mar 2017 12:13 #2

  • dynodave
  • dynodave's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • dynodave
  • Posts: 450
  • Thank you received: 263
Spring 2012

Gearbox pressure myth

Any gearbox breather discussion is a WAY over sold mod, even to the point of being ridiculous and should not be a real concern. Internet articles and forum postings on this subject are in my opinion of very low credibility. This is why.

I built a pressure test rig using a very low-pressure high-resolution gauge, regulator and ball valve I did a series of pressure tests of the AMC gearbox on my 72 combat. While the test included the demonstration of my clutch rod seals ability to restrain oil leakage, I was actually trying to debunk what I believed to be an unsubstantiated old wives tail about gearbox breathing/venting deficiency and the need for further breathing mods. This test was demonstrated at a few of the national rally tech sessions, and remained installed for an extended period of time to be able to redemonstrate the test at local tech sessions.

The first main leakage path is the path in the main shaft... this is what my CCRS fixes.
A close second leakage path would be the normal early vent in the little round access cover or the 850&MKIII brass tube style vent.
The third path is the clutch cable entrance. This can NOT hold pressure, even if you seal around the cable with RTV, the leakage also goes up the cable itself up to the handle bar.
A minor but variable fourth leakage path is the between the main shaft and sleeve gear bush.

In the final test the cable exit was totally plugged with a small rubber stopper and tested with soapy water for no leakage. Even with all the passages sealed, try as I might to actively pressurize the gearbox after totally sealing leakage paths one, two and three, there was no ability to view any residual pressure once the ball valve was shut to stop the regulated compressed air source. All remaining air pressure vented through the sleeve gear. The very high resolution...low pressure gauge went to zero quite quickly, soapy water bubbles showed the air leaving. The results were as I expected, and the normal gearbox is absolutely NOT able to hold pressure, especially once the clutch cable is reinstalled.

I would have no problem using an undrilled MKIII access cover or without the MKIII brass vent on AMC gearboxes. The results of the test show that any theoretical air expansion causing a pressurization of the gearbox due to heat from operation is in my opinion totally bogus and without any merit what so ever.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Gearboxes Galore 15 Apr 2017 21:47 #3

  • dynodave
  • dynodave's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • dynodave
  • Posts: 450
  • Thank you received: 263
I am now in the assembly stage of the box for the 88SS. Upon completion of button up, I twirled the input shaft and found it to have tight and easy turn spots....HUMMMM
Well I marked the input shaft with a black sharpy on top when a tightspot occurred,
Held the input shaft and moved the kicker shaft to reorient the layshaft. and now the tight and loose spots had moved in relation to the marks. Damn it's the layshaft that's bent.
Tear down 10-12 minutes.
layshaft on V blocks with dial indicator. spin/measure.
.012" up to down swing on the dial indicator SO .006" bent shaft.
have 6 more layshafts handy and find another is bent .003" the rest are close to straight, all about .001" or so.
Pick out good shaft and back to work soon as I finish this note. :evil:

Shaft straightening will be for another day.........
The following user(s) said Thank You: commando6868, jim winning

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Gearboxes Galore 16 Apr 2017 10:03 #4

  • dynodave
  • dynodave's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • dynodave
  • Posts: 450
  • Thank you received: 263
The gearbox is back together with a straight layshaft and a tweek on the hair pin ratchet spring.
In neutral it spins sweet as if there was nothing inside the box. In gear, the machinery still moves smooth as silk though the oiled gear bushes drag on the shafts as expected.
The box is now in the frame and this chapter is over.
:)
The following user(s) said Thank You: mikethgreek, jim winning

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.021 seconds